36 posts tagged “books”
I suppose it would be an OK read on a long flight or something, but nothing I'd recommend to a friend.
On to Number Two!
There is a third book in the Wicked series called A Lion Among Men, which is about the Cowardly Lion. Initially I was going to pass on it because I just wasn't interested in his story. However, a synopsis of the novel mentioned that it told more of the Wicked Witch's story, so I may have to read it after all. I'll definitely be reading more by Gregory Maguire. I love his writing style, and his characters have so much depth. It's really great reading.
I feel like a huge moron this year having fallen so ridiculously short of my 25 books during the year goal. So far, I've only finished 9, but I'm hoping to break double-digits with Son of a Witch, which I couldn't help, but go out and buy today.
Anyway, I'm thinking that maybe for 2009, I'll set the bar a little lower for myself (hangs head in shame) and shoot for 15 books instead of 25. After all, 15 is still 50% more than I'll have read for this year. What really sucks, though, is I got the 25 books goal, by halving the 50 books in a year goal that there were various groups for on Vox and Shelfari. How embarrassing.
So I'm pretty set on going for completing 15 books in the coming year. Hopefully, I won't embarrass myself as badly as this year. Sheesh!
Surely the reason I was able to finish this book relatively quickly (I've mentioned before that I'm a really slow reader) is that I was hardly able to put it down. In fact, I stayed up until1 a.m. last night finishing it up. It was wonderful!
I never actually read the book The Wizard of Oz, so I have no idea how accurately the movie portrays it, but this book seemed so much more complex and real than The Wizard of Oz could ever be. The subjects of religion and politics were taken on, as well as civil rights. It was just an amazing read.
The end left me feeling similar to the way I feel when I read Romeo and Juliet. I know they're both going to die, but still, I can't help but hold out hope that this time it will be different and they'll live happily ever after. It was the same for Wicked. I knew before even reading the first page that Dorothy was going to throw a bucket of water at her and kill her, but I wanted so badly for it to end differently for her that I couldn't help but harbor a little hope. So when the Wicked Witch of the West inevitably died at the end, I cried.
I haven't read the teaser at the end for Son of a Witch yet, but I'm going to add it to my Amazon list because I just need to know what happens next. I guess if the last page of a book leaves you yearning for more, that's the sign of a great story.
The last part of the book is about him going to Japan to quit smoking. Who the hell moves to Japan for a few months to quit smoking? Apparently, David Sedaris does. Anyway, the stuff about Japan was OK, but I think it was just the fact that I could relate to all the funny, weird things you see and hear and experience as a westerner living in Asia. It made me miss Korea. That's about it, though.
I've moved on to Wicked, and I seriously doubt that I'll be able to add it to my pathetic "read in '08 list.' I'm slow. I can't decide what number of books I should take on for the upcoming year. Maybe 15? That's a bit lame, but obviously I wasn't even able to get that many in this year, so maybe I need to take baby steps.
You may have noticed, but probably not, that my 25 books read in '08 goal came to a screeching halt as soon as school picked up. Which sucks. For months and months, I haven't read anything that wasn't assigned for me to read. It really takes the joy out of reading. Plus, not reading makes me feel like an idiot.
I've been "in the middle of" two books that I borrowed from my in-laws for pretty much all the months that I haven't read shit. If they even remember they lent them to me, they've probably given up on seeing them again, and have concluded that their daughter-in-law is a book thief.
Last night I resolved to break my funk. I recently got David Sedaris's newest book, When You Are Engulfed in Flames, and I decided that since Sedaris's essays are generally short, and pretty much always goddamn hilarious, that it would be a good book to start off with. I figure if I even read just one essay a night, at least I'm reading SOMETHING, right?
I read the first three essays last night, and Joe could hear me chortling to myself from the other room. I need to remember that if I'm feeling down, a good Sedaris essay can have me chortling my way to a better mood in minutes. I also need to remember that the word "chortle" and any variation on it, makes me giggle.
After reading two books in a row that were more of a chore than a pleasure, I was so relieved to find, almost immediately, that I was drawn into the story, empathized with the characters, and didn't want to put the book down. I spent the last few nights reading in bed until my vision blurred and I couldn't keep my eyes open.
The Blood of Flowers is set in 17th century Iran, and is about a young woman with a talent for making beautiful, ornate carpets, a craft that was elevated to a high art by the Shah at the time. It follows her over the course of a few years, and details her rise from a willful, rash child to a talented, independent woman. I found it heartbreaking and hopeful, infuriating and satisfying. The main story is broken up with folk tales, which are used effectively as tools of foreshadowing. Perhaps a little too effectively, as I could sometimes tell what was going to happen a good 100 pages out. It was worth the read, though. The story itself was beautiful.
I'm really coming to love these works of historical fiction, focused on the lives of women. I particularly like that the ones I've read recently have been about places that have histories that are largely unknown to me - China, in the case of Snow Flower and the Secret Fan and Iran in the case of this book. I'm really hoping that this isn't what is considered 'chick-lit.' I must admit that I really don't know what qualifies a book as 'chick-lit,' but I've just assumed that they were the Candace Bushnell kind of books (not that I've read any of her books, but I do know that she wrote Sex and the City). Those kind of books don't appeal to me in the least, but these beautiful historical fictions do. Regardless of how they may be categorized, I'm sure there's a distinct difference.
The second story however, was wonderful, and dreamy, and sad, and very, very good. It's unfortunate that this great story, which could have easily stood on it's own, and even been elaborated upon until it was novel-length itself, was attached to the other.
Were it not for my obsessive nature regarding finishing a book once I've started it, I may not have gotten far enough into the book to reach the good part.
On to #7.