5 posts tagged “historical fiction”
After reading two books in a row that were more of a chore than a pleasure, I was so relieved to find, almost immediately, that I was drawn into the story, empathized with the characters, and didn't want to put the book down. I spent the last few nights reading in bed until my vision blurred and I couldn't keep my eyes open.
The Blood of Flowers is set in 17th century Iran, and is about a young woman with a talent for making beautiful, ornate carpets, a craft that was elevated to a high art by the Shah at the time. It follows her over the course of a few years, and details her rise from a willful, rash child to a talented, independent woman. I found it heartbreaking and hopeful, infuriating and satisfying. The main story is broken up with folk tales, which are used effectively as tools of foreshadowing. Perhaps a little too effectively, as I could sometimes tell what was going to happen a good 100 pages out. It was worth the read, though. The story itself was beautiful.
I'm really coming to love these works of historical fiction, focused on the lives of women. I particularly like that the ones I've read recently have been about places that have histories that are largely unknown to me - China, in the case of Snow Flower and the Secret Fan and Iran in the case of this book. I'm really hoping that this isn't what is considered 'chick-lit.' I must admit that I really don't know what qualifies a book as 'chick-lit,' but I've just assumed that they were the Candace Bushnell kind of books (not that I've read any of her books, but I do know that she wrote Sex and the City). Those kind of books don't appeal to me in the least, but these beautiful historical fictions do. Regardless of how they may be categorized, I'm sure there's a distinct difference.
It wasn't boring. I was interested in the plot very quickly.
It wasn't too long. It's 560-something pages, which is kind of long, but not that long.
I think the issue was that the chapters were nice and short, and gave too many opportunities for good places to stop. Not Da Vinci Code short, but short enough.
Anyway...
I wanted to read this book because I remember my dad telling me (a long time ago) that it was his favorite book. And it is a very good book. It takes place from the late '20's to the mid-50's in what is now Israel. It gives tons of history for the area, and goes into great detail about what happened in that part of the world during those times...
- Israel's declaration of independence
- Issues among the Palestinian refugees
- Fighting among the Arab states concerning the Jews as well as the Palestinians...
The book was very good, though, and I'm now interested in reading more from Leon Uris. Hopefully he has something that will leave me smiling when I finish it instead of frowning.
It was a really great book, anyway, though, and I'd highly recommend it. As soon as I got into the story, I didn't want to put it down!
What I like most about Lisa See's novels (the two I've read, anyway) is that, in addition to being well told stories, they've opened my eyes to a bit of history that I would otherwise know very little about. Chinese history, in particular women in Chinese history, is something I think very few Americans know anything about. I'm becoming quite the fan.
If you care to read what the actual plot of this novel is about, you should check out the synopsis on amazon.com. It's better than anything I could write about it.
After coming back from Hawaii, I was (and still am) missing the place very badly. So, of course, this book stood out to me right away. It's about a little Hawaiian girl named Rachel who contracts Leprosy, and is subsequently sent to the leper colony on the island of Moloka'i. The novel begins at the turn of the century, when Hawaii was still its own kingdom, and spans the entirety of Rachel's life, which is a surprisingly long time.
Moloka'i is extremely well written as well as emotionally jarring. I found myself reading it through eyes clouded over with tears numerous times!
I'd definitely recommend this book, and on a scale of good, meh, and bad, I'd give it a solid Good.